Pierre Bertholon de Saint-Lazare, a French physicist and philosopher, was credited with the discovery of electricity. He argued that the energy transferred from light to plants and the energy resulting from “the pull of gravity” provided the plant with the necessary physical cues to influence and adapt. Botany, a branch of biology that deals with the study of plants, includes their structure, properties, and biochemical processes. Alessandro Volta, an Italian physicist, discovered that certain chemical reactions could produce electricity and invented the voltaic pile in 1800.
In 1926, Bose demonstrated that the fast movements performed by the leaves of Mimosa sp. and Desmodium sp. were caused by long-distance electrical signaling using isolated vascular bundles of fungi. The 1970s saw the rise of new patch-clamp methods invented by Erwin Neher and Bert Sakmann in Germany, which ultimately led them to the Nobel prize.
Jan Ingenhousz, an 18th-century Dutch physician, biologist, and chemist, discovered how plants convert light into energy through photosynthesis. This relationship between magnetic fields and currents is crucial for Michael Faraday’s invention of the electric motor in 1821.
Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Edison, Benjamin Franklin, and others contributed to the discovery of electricity. Franklin discovered electricity in the 1700s with his kite experiment, while Volta discovered static electricity by rubbing fur on amber. Volta became interested in electricity and began conducting experiments to study its properties. In 1775, he invented the electrophore, a device that allowed scientists to study the properties of electricity.
📹 Eco India: A retired Botany professor in the city of Pune has never used electricity in her life
Every week, Eco India brings you stories of innovations from across India and Europe, and the people who make them possible.
Who studied the nature of electricity?
Electricity was a subject of intellectual curiosity for millennia until 1600 when William Gilbert wrote De Magnete, which studied electricity and magnetism. He coined the term “electricus” to refer to the property of attracting small objects after being rubbed, giving rise to the English words “electric” and “electricity”. Other notable works in the 17th and early 18th centuries included Otto von Guericke, Robert Boyle, Stephen Gray, and C. F. du Fay.
Benjamin Franklin conducted extensive research in the 18th century, selling his possessions to fund his work. In 1752, he attached a metal key to the bottom of a dampened kite string and flown the kite in a storm-threatened sky, showing that lightning was indeed electrical in nature.
In 1775, Hugh Williamson reported experiments on the shocks delivered by the electric eel, while surgeon and anatomist John Hunter described the structure of the fish’s electric organs. Luigi Galvani published his discovery of bioelectromagnetics in 1791, demonstrating that electricity was the medium by which neurons passed signals to the muscles. Alessandro Volta’s battery, made from alternating layers of zinc and copper, provided scientists with a more reliable source of electrical energy than electrostatic machines.
The recognition of electromagnetism, the unity of electric and magnetic phenomena, was due to Hans Christian Ørsted and André-Marie Ampère in 1819-1820. Michael Faraday invented the electric motor in 1821, and Georg Ohm mathematically analyzed the electrical circuit in 1827. James Clerk Maxwell definitively linked electricity and magnetism (and light) in his work “On Physical Lines of Force” in 1861 and 1862.
Who invented electricity plants?
In 1884, Thomas Edison built the world’s first central power plant in Manhattan, New York, and installed the first Edison Isolated Electric Plant on campus in 1884. By 1891, all major buildings on the west side of campus had electric lights, and the Iowa General Assembly provided $5, 000 for a new power station. The new plant, designed by Professor George Bissell, was built directly north of Engineering Hall (today’s Lab of Mechanics Building) and housed a Corliss steam engine that used steam from coal-fired boilers to generate electricity.
The exhaust steam from the engine was used to heat the nearby Engineering Hall, demonstrating the efficiency of cogeneration plants, which can produce thermal energy and electricity using a single fuel.
Who actually discovered the first use of electricity?
Electricity was discovered by Benjamin Franklin in the 1700s through a kite experiment. Franklin flew a kite with a metal key tied to it during a thunderstorm, demonstrating the advancement of modern technology. This fascinating topic can help children understand how life has changed due to electricity. A detailed electricity timeline can be found on a wiki page that includes a detailed electricity timeline. Learning about electricity’s history can provide a better understanding of how modern technology has evolved.
Who discovered energy in plants?
Jan Ingenhousz was a Dutch-born British physician and scientist who discovered the process of photosynthesis, which involves green plants absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen in sunlight. He was an early proponent of variolation, which used live, unmodified virus from mild cases of smallpox. In 1768, he traveled to Vienna to inoculate the family of Austrian empress Maria Theresa and served as court physician.
In 1779, he published a study on the chemical effects of plant physiology, Experiments upon Vegetables, Discovering Their Great Power of Purifying the Common Air in Sunshine and of Injuring It in the Shade and at Night.
Ingenhousz found that light is necessary for photosynthesis, only green parts of the plant perform photosynthesis, and all living parts of the plant damage the air. However, the extent of air restoration by a green plant far exceeds its damaging effect.
Who first figured out the nature of electricity?
Thales of Miletus, a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher from the 6th century BCE, is often credited with the earliest recorded discovery of electricity. His observations and experiments with amber, or “elektron” in Greek, marked a foundational moment in the history of electrical science. Thales discovered that when amber was rubbed with another substance, like fur, it would attract small objects such as feathers or straw, which is now known as static electricity. This discovery marked a significant milestone in the development of electrical science and the exploration of its true potential.
Who is the real father of electricity?
Michael Faraday, known as the father of electricity, was an English scientist who discovered the laws of electromagnetism and invented the first electric motors. Despite having little formal education, Faraday became the first Fullerian Professor of Chemistry at the Royal Institution of Great Britain and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1824. To commemorate the 200th anniversary of his discovery, the IEC Academy is hosting a free webinar conversation with Frank James, author of Michael Faraday: A very short introduction.
The conversation will cover Faraday’s life and works, from his humble beginnings as a London blacksmith to his groundbreaking discoveries at the Royal Society. It will also explore how Faraday applied his research to real-life situations, such as the electrification of lighthouses and long-distance telegraph signaling.
Did Nikola Tesla invent electricity?
Nikola Tesla, born in 1856 in Smiljan, Croatia, is considered one of the fathers of modern electricity. His contributions to energy science rival Thomas Edison’s. Tesla, an energy visionary, laid the groundwork for electricity generation and delivery systems. He believed that to find the secrets of the universe, one should think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration. Despite being ridiculed for his early work on electricity, Tesla’s inventions and thinking continue to influence modern technology. His life and work continue to shape our understanding of the universe.
Who really invented the electricity?
Despite the discovery of electricity, no single individual can be credited with its discovery. Several individuals over centuries contributed to the study of electricity, including Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus, who discovered the effects of magnetism and static electricity by rubbing amber with fur. English scientist William Gilbert coined the term “electricus” in 1600, meaning “amber-like”, which was later changed to “electricity” by Sir Thomas Browne in 1646.
Who is the father of flower power?
Flower power originated from Ginsberg’s recommendations to organizers of a 1965 peace march. He advocated for the utilization of imagination and visual spectacles, particularly at the front lines, with the objective of making a statement that would challenge the conventional wisdom regarding war psychology. George Edgerly Harris III, better known as Hibiscus, was a pivotal figure in this movement, advocating for the utilization of flowers and organizing front lines with flowers in advance.
Who really invented electricity?
Benjamin Franklin, a renowned scientist, is often credited with discovering electricity. He was one of the greatest scientists of his time, with a wide range of interests and inventions. In the mid-1700s, Franklin became interested in electricity, which he believed had positive and negative elements and flowed between them. He also believed that lightning was a form of flowing electricity. Franklin’s famous kite experiment in 1752 demonstrated that lightning was electricity by flying a kite during a thunderstorm and connecting a metal key to the kite string. This groundbreaking discovery marked a significant milestone in the field of electricity.
Who discovered the theory of electricity?
Benjamin Franklin, a renowned scientist, is often credited with discovering electricity. He was one of the greatest scientists of his time, with a wide range of interests and inventions. In the mid-1700s, Franklin became interested in electricity, which he believed had positive and negative elements and flowed between them. He also believed that lightning was a form of flowing electricity. Franklin’s famous kite experiment in 1752 demonstrated that lightning was electricity by flying a kite during a thunderstorm and connecting a metal key to the kite string. This groundbreaking discovery marked a significant milestone in the field of electricity.
📹 Scientists have found a way to extract energy from photosynthesis | DW News
Scientists led by Cambridge University have found a way to extract energy from photosynthesis. The research published in the …
Two lessons i learned from respected hema sane and her self spoken words of wisdom: 1: Everyone should have their own ideas how to live life. I cannot say or stand that my idea is the ideal one. I dont have any tall claims at all. My life is like this. I like it. Live life on your own terms irrespective of whether the society, family likes it or not. Secondly 2 : interviewer : given a chance would you change anything ? Hema sane : after a moment of silence in marathi “* challai te chan challai *” – meaning (whats going on is going great) The acceptance and adoration and fully embracing the path you’ve choosen. one example is this beautiful lady. My wholehearted respect and salute to you maam. 😊 ❤️
Wow! How truly inspiring. While perusal this I switched my fan off as it is monsoon now and really not unbearably hot. It is just a comfort to have a little bit of fan air but I can forego it. Definitely gonna start thinking about every little aspect of energy that I use up as to how I can use bare minimum and conserve for future. So thankful to this website for bringing up Hema Sane ji’s case. I am going to spread a word about this in my circles.
She really pushed me into thinking..Do we need all so much to live ? Are we so dependent on technology for survival..? Do we really need all those latest updates and upgrades? Does all this lastest updates n all help us at all in gathering knowledge or to become a better person? Thanks I will review my way of life for sure…
I barely make any comments on YouTube articles but this is really amazingly compelling it’s 15 July 2019 and I really wish when I have the full freedom to live my life on my own terms I’ll definitely live a life like this lady she’s so calm and full of pure & valuable wisdom. All thanks to the website for discovering her and featuring her ideology and lifestyle by this beautifully made article.
When we see such great human beings we feel ashamed of ourselves. But we should get inspired and come out of this endless vague comfort level and stand out to do really what we are supposed to do. I am really proud of her and pray for her to continue her voyage healthily and happily. Thanks to this website too👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Really she is great the most important msg which we can get from her is she is happy in her own world she is happy in what she is doing & satisfied too which is the most important thing which one needs in life happiness can only be achieved by inner satisfaction other than things near you all are just suplimentry happiness is just inner satisfaction great Mam hats off to you
watching this article really bring tears in my eyes…how strong a women can b she is perfect example… There is no one who is living with her still she is so strong with her thought to save nd give resources to future generations… we can’t live even one day like her…at this age she bended but her height is more than any other I have read off or seen…😇😇😇 God bless her nd may we have more souls like hers…😊😊
Salute to this great lady…she is leaving her life in her own style Nd proving us that life can be survived with little resources..a lots of things to learn from her.. every one must watch this article Nd specially girls..this is not a sarcasm but being I girl I can relate a lots of things which we miss use now a days…really a hell lots of things need to learn from her…love you Sane Mam..Nd lots of respect nd Gratitude🙏🇮🇳❤️😘
She is living with nature minus any electronics or consumer goods just as our ancestors did, and yet she’s right in the middle of modern civilization. She walks barefoot in dirt which gives vitamin B12 and helps in brain functions. She draws water from a well without any help despite her obviously degenerative spinal cord. At 79, she continues to write and publish textbooks… WE need to take supplements and vitamin tablets to compensate for all the nutrient requirements which we don’t get from the “food” we consume, and cannot do any of the daily chores she does so effortlessly. We suffer from all kinds of lifestyle diseases, disorders, addictions, and stress. We really need to get inspired and learn from Dr. Sane to live a simple and yet meaningful life. Deep respect! 🙏
Some of the explanations in this are incorrect. While the plants’ photosynthetic organelles, the chloroplasts, can convert almost 100% of the light they absorb, the plant doesn’t use 100% of visible light. Especially green light is not used in photosynthesis and is reflected, and because of that most photosynthetic plants are green.
I am quite sceptical about the reporting of it. As is my understanding of photosynthesis it is actually not that efficient, because it doesn’t need to be. There is mostly plenty of light available, so evolution made good enough. Base on what he said and based on University of Cambridge article about it, they just want to “steal” the extra energy that is created but not used during the plant grow. Which is cool and all, but this is really really really far from actual aplication. The computer as they mention is very simple devices that could be powered by potato battery, we are not talking about PC here and it required a lot of care to keep the source of it alive. What I am saying is: this is like talking about nuclear fission in the 30s, it looks possible, but there is a long way to go.
Photosynthesis and respiration are reactions that complement each other in the environment. They are in reality the same reactions but occurring in reverse. While in photosynthesis carbon dioxide and water yield glucose and oxygen, through the respiration process glucose and oxygen yield carbon dioxide and water. The products of one process are the reactants of the other. Notice that the equation for cellular respiration is the direct opposite of photosynthesis: Cellular Respiration: C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O. Photosynthesis: 6CO2 + 6H2O → C6H12O6+ 6O. (CK-12; Diffen) 0:16
Really tired of these reports. For over 40 years I’ve heard these from the science community. Problem is the majority simply are not commercially viable. They cost too much and/or cannot be scaled up. So while a neat benchtop experiment, that’s where they stay. The business is in grant money to keep these folks going.
During photosynthesis, plants open tiny pores on their leaf surfaces to suck carbon dioxide from the air and produce their own food. A chemical process that occurs in plants, algae, and some types of bacteria, when they are exposed to sunlight. During photosynthesis, water and carbon dioxide combine to form carbohydrates (sugars) and give off oxygen. 0:49 (LBL; NCI)
You can also use earth/mud energy batteries. Its solid science, no hocus-pocus. I considered it for a while, but you need a lot of time and space to make it work. In general, solar panels are better and easy – except earth batteries/energy work at night as well. Earth-energy seems interesting in rural area’s. But its unknown and with cheap solar and batteries coming, it wont be very appealing. Too muddy 😉
The biggest news with this is that plants are natural carbon sinks. We could counteract climate change using this on a wide enough scale. You wouldn’t have the ‘rebreather’ problem of forests that burn down releasing their carbon or seasonal cycles causing the carbon level to oscillate. You can just sequester carbon on an industrial scale indefinitely.
As usual, none of the really important questions were asked. Get help from experts to help distinguish real breakthroughs from irrelevant lab experiments. Here are some questions I would have asked: – What percentage of light is converted into electricity? (then compare it to current solar panels) – What maintenance is required over the course of 20 years runtime? – If you had to make a swimming pool sized installation tomorrow, what problems (if any) would stop you from doing that?
It won’t take carbon out of the atmosphere unless it results in growing more plants. It will avoid emissions from other fuels that it replaces. That will be a benefit. It will have to work at very large scales to make a difference: iron smelting and concrete burning require lots of heat now obtained in the form of fossil carbon. Also fertilizer making. Running a small sink like a computer is inconsequential. Replacing industrial processes is more interesting.
The percentage of light that plants absorb from the visible spectrum varies depending on the plant species and specific pigments present. On average, plants absorb approximately 45-50% of the sunlight in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) range, which spans from 400 nm to 700 nm in the visible spectrum. The efficiency of plants at converting absorbed light into chemical energy (stored as carbohydrates) through photosynthesis is relatively low, usually around 3-6% for most crops. The theoretical maximum efficiency of photosynthesis, known as the quantum efficiency, is estimated to be around 8-10%. This is due to various factors, such as energy losses during light absorption, energy conversion steps in photosynthesis, and the fact that plants need to balance light harvesting with other metabolic processes and protection against damage from excess light. In comparison, modern solar panels have an efficiency ranging from 15% to over 20% for commercial panels, and experimental or laboratory-grade solar cells have achieved efficiencies above 40%. Solar panels convert sunlight directly into electricity, and their efficiency is measured by the proportion of incident sunlight that is converted into usable electrical energy. While solar panels have a higher efficiency in converting sunlight to usable energy than plants, it’s important to note that the two systems serve different purposes. Plants convert sunlight into chemical energy to fuel their growth and reproduction, while solar panels generate electricity for human use.
Isn’t photosynthesis capped by the massconcentration of co2? Can’t imagine how this can be a major energy source tbh. Maybe if its very cheap and the logisitics of it are solved perfectly we could use it as a very large area substitution to other energy sources. It surely isnt the power source to solve our energy problems.
😂😂 news anchor is more excited than scientists himself ….may be she live in fantasy ….as I am an engineer want to ask scientists what is Energy density of plant vs solar panel …may we need a forest to produce electricity as same a bunch of solar panel can …. Solar PV can mount on EV PLANE or motorbike,car not plant not to forget satellite or outer earth space where no CO2 or Water available….she is thrilled 😂
This sounds like cold fusion. Plants do not absorb 100 percent of light. They use a limited set of wavelengths in the process of photosynthesis. The actual mechanism was presented in one sentence that did not say much. If this really happens I will be very happy. I don’t see any evidence presented here that anything is actually happening. What is the chemical that captures the electron? How does it get harnessed to produce current? Why is the amount stolen by the experiment not significant to the plant? Tell me this and I might find it more interesting. Until then, this is just another version of cold fusion: a nice idea that does not really happen in real life.
What is wrong with people? We literally have everything we need. Food grows on trees. The climate was stable and temperate. The reason we have problems is because some people think it is never enough. Every population of organisms expands to the limits of the available energy supply and decimates the ecosystem, or it is checked by predators. Humans are not different. If you add more energy, it will simply be used and the same dilemma will result. As enlightened being, we are supposed to be capable of the challenging activity known as self-limiting. More energy is not the problem. Excessive growth, consumption, and distribution are the only challenges we face.
Generating electricity from photosynthesis by shining lasers on plant leaves which showed electrons getting dislodged in the process…will take more research and experimentations to bring it to practical use. They important component of the discovery is the fact that this could be translated to a more efficient production and transfer of electrons/energy using similar materials. I would not want to attempt electrically connecting millions of little wires to leaves in the forest only to get blown by the next wind storm. Overall any new discoveries in physics or science such as this will be appreciated in time as experiments are carried out and useful findings are applied to real life and practical applications.👍
Photosynthesis is truly a marvel of creation. It’s sad that so many people take it for granted and don’t give credit to our Creator for this amazing process. Humans are very quick to take the credit for their “discoveries”, especially if they can design something by imitating what they find. All they’re really doing is copying what our Creator originally designed and made. I find it totally illogical that it takes intelligent humans to design and make a copy, but they say the original, incredible design just evolved instead of acknowledging that a superior, intelligent Being created it. Wherever you look in the universe and on our earth, there is irrefutable evidence of a Creator. As Revelation 4:11 says: “You are worthy, our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.”