In 2023, the world’s largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters were China, the United States, India, the EU27, Russia, and Brazil. Indonesia accounted for the largest CO2 emissions in Southeast Asia at about 619 million metric tons, making it one of the five largest CO2 emitters in the region. China is the world’s largest annual greenhouse gas emitter, emitting nearly 10 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) in 2020. North America, dominated by the USA, is the second most polluting region in the world.
The Asia-Pacific region, with the world’s most populous and fastest-growing economies, emits the largest volume of greenhouse gas, producing about half the world’s carbon dioxide. India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Indonesia are also among the top ten CO2 emitters globally. Efforts must be intensified to accelerate efforts to reduce emissions.
In 2023, China, India, Russia, and Brazil increased their emissions compared to 2022, with India having the largest increase in relative emissions. China is the world’s largest annual greenhouse gas emitter, emitting 26.4 of global greenhouse gas emissions. Electricity production in Indonesia and the Philippines emits the highest carbon emissions, although they have the lowest electricity production per capita.
📹 How do countries calculate greenhouse gas emissions?
There’s lots of talk about how some countries emit significantly more greenhouse gases than others. And as we all know, …
Which 3 countries are the largest emitters of greenhouse gases today?
Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, there has been a notable increase in carbon dioxide emissions, predominantly resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. The three countries with the highest levels of emissions are China, the United States, and the European Union. When emissions per capita are considered, the United States and Russia have the highest rates. The majority of global greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to a relatively limited number of countries.
Which 3 countries have the highest CO2 emissions?
China, the United States, India, Russia, and Japan have the highest carbon footprints globally, with emissions reaching 37. 1536. 8 billion tonnes since 2022. In 2023, projections show a 1. 1% increase in emissions, reaching a peak of 37. 55 gigatons of CO2, marking a new record. Understanding the reasons behind these high emissions is crucial. Examining countries with the highest carbon footprint can provide a more focused understanding of carbon emissions and help identify ways to reduce their impact. By focusing on these countries, we can work towards reducing the harmful effects of carbon emissions.
Which country has the worst greenhouse gases?
The main disadvantage of measuring total national emissions is that it doesn’t consider population size. China, with the largest CO2 and GHG emissions in the world, has the second largest population. To provide a fair comparison, emissions should be analyzed in terms of CO2 and GHG per capita. China’s levels in 2022 were nearly two-thirds of those of the United States and less than a sixth of those of Palau. In 2023, China, the United States, India, the EU27, Russia, and Brazil were the world’s largest GHG emitters, accounting for 49.
8% of the global population, 63. 2 of the global gross domestic product, 64. 2 of global fossil fuel consumption, and 62. 7 of global GHG emissions. India had the largest increase in relative terms and China the largest absolute increase by 784 Mt CO2 eq.
Which country in Asia is carbon negative?
Bhutan is the world’s first carbon-negative country, with its vast forests absorbing more CO2 than the country emits from all activities. This achievement is attributed to Bhutan’s holistic approach to development, which prioritizes spiritual, physical, and social well-being, cultural and environmental conservation. The country’s constitution mandates that at least 60 of its land remains forested for generations, enhancing carbon sequestration. The Kingdom’s abundant forests, covering 72.
3 of its land, represent ecological and biodiversity reserves and massive carbon assets, making them a significant “carbon bank”. Bhutan’s rivers generate low-carbon hydroelectricity for neighboring countries, reducing regional emissions. In 2021, Bhutan generated nearly 11, 000 GWh of electricity and exported over 80 of it. Bhutan’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) suggest offsetting 22.
4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions by 2025 through hydroelectricity exports. Bhutan is also embracing global technology and innovation to create more accurate, efficient, secure, and transparent carbon markets.
Who is the largest polluter in Asia?
A new report by IQAir has revealed that all but one of the 100 cities with the world’s worst air pollution in 2023 were in Asia. The climate crisis is a major factor in the poor air quality, which is posing a threat to the health of billions of people worldwide. The majority of these cities, 83 of which were in India, exceeded the World Health Organization’s air quality guidelines by more than 10 times. The study focused on fine particulate matter (PM2. 5), the tiniest but most dangerous pollutant. Only 9 out of over 7, 800 cities analyzed globally met WHO’s standard.
Which Asian country has the highest carbon emissions?
In 2021, China, the most prominent nation in the Asia-Pacific region, was responsible for over half of the total COâ‚‚ emissions, representing approximately 10%. A total of 5 billion metric tons. This makes China the country with the highest level of CO2 emissions, with an annual contract that must be renewed after one year. Furthermore, the most significant statistic presented on this page is also included in this account.
Which country emits the most greenhouse gases?
China is the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide gas, emitting 11, 397 million metric tons in 2022. The primary source of CO2 emissions is fossil fuels, particularly coal, which accounts for 58 of the total energy generated. Burning coal in power and industrial plants releases significant amounts of CO2. China is also one of the largest oil importers, contributing to CO2 emissions through the use of motor vehicles.
Who are the top 10 greenhouse gas emitters?
In 2020, the top ten greenhouse gas emitters were China, the United States, India, the European Union, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, Japan, Iran, and Canada. These countries accounted for approximately 67 of total greenhouse gas emissions. Land use changes, including energy, agriculture, forestry, and land use change, also contributed to these emissions. Net global greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, forestry, and other land use were approximately 12 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent, or about 21 of total global emissions.
In areas like the United States and Europe, changes in land use associated with human activities partially offset emissions from deforestation in other regions. These changes in land use contribute to the overall greenhouse gas emissions.
Who are the top 5 largest emitters of greenhouse gases?
In 2020, the top ten greenhouse gas emitters were China, the United States, India, the European Union, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, Japan, Iran, and Canada. These countries accounted for approximately 67 of total greenhouse gas emissions. Land use changes, including energy, agriculture, forestry, and land use change, also contributed to these emissions. Net global greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, forestry, and other land use were approximately 12 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent, or about 21 of total global emissions.
In areas like the United States and Europe, changes in land use associated with human activities partially offset emissions from deforestation in other regions. These changes in land use contribute to the overall greenhouse gas emissions.
What are the top 3 sources of greenhouse gas emissions globally?
Greenhouse gases, which trap heat and cause global warming, are primarily caused by human activities. The largest source of emissions in the United States is from burning fossil fuels for electricity, heat, and transportation. The EPA tracks total U. S. emissions through the Inventory of U. S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks, which estimates national emissions and removals associated with human activities across the country.
What are the top waste producing countries in Asia?
Indonesia is the largest producer of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 64 million tons produced annually. Thailand is the second-largest MSW producer in the region, with an estimated 26 million tons produced annually. Vietnam produces 77 million tons, while the Philippines produces 22 million tons. In addition, Malaysia produces 12 million tons. The total quantity of MSW produced in Indonesia is estimated to be 84 million tons.
📹 China’s Next Economic Transformation: Going Carbon Neutral by 2060 | WSJ
In the biggest climate commitment made by any nation, China pledged to go carbon neutral by 2060. While it will be challenging …
To people criticizing China, needs to remember, the pollutions that goes into manufacturing the things you buy from China, which is basically everything, is counted as China’s carbon emission. There is no us and them in climate change, the entire world’s economy is connected, and everything who lives a modern lifestyle is responsible for it. Which is why I roll my eyes when someone praise Bhutan for being Carbon negative. well of course they are, they don’t make anything. Their consumerism, however small is counted on the industrialized nations they import from.
For the west to blame China for pollution is a bit like for people in cars to blame people on public transport for occupying too much space during rush hour. While its true buses and trams takes up a lot of room, but considering how many people they carry, they are far more space efficient than any private cars.
I am a Chinese, Due to the covid -19 I can’t go aboard at the national holiday (7 days), So I travelled to the far west of mainland China. To my surprise (you know I am a Chinese I also been astonished), On the desert I saw hundreds of thousands wind turbines that each has 30 -40 meters height cover all over till the horizen. If not saw this, I may still think what Xi said is a dream that far from reach. But now, I think it is possible. As a Chinese I feel ashamed to what I thought before.
One key metric which I’ve heard is that Solar Energy is finally competitive with oil directly, in terms of cost per unit energy, in areas like Texas. This makes China’s plans significantly more achievable and unambitious than if they were to be declared 20 years ago; that is, this is going to be well within what China does best: Scaling something already achievable up to ludicrous scales, and finishing off the last problems with the technology until it is just done well. I still expect the first 10 years to be a gongshow that will cause the rest of the world to laugh; followed by the next 20 to be one where we fall silent unless we’re desperate haters, because that seems to be the pattern overall.
I sat at a dinner table once with some Chinese colleagues. The topics of conversations they chose to talk about all had to do with business, technology, start-ups, figuring out how to make money. Compare that to an average American dinner table conversation where the topic was mainly on wearing masks or the next hot Netflix show or some new social media influencer, and you start to get a picture of which side is more motivated to win.
China shouldn’t supply a cheap products for the wolrd, pollution happen in china, damaging happen in China, slavered labors happen in China, most profit earned by importers, not Chinese! Blaming China for polution sounds rediculous, Chinese norman citizens suffered a lot for that, Plz turn these supply chain to other countries!
Ranking of carbon emissions per capita in major countries(ton/per person in 1 year): Canada 16.55 USA 15.32 S.Korea 13.02 Russia 12.04 Japan 10.49 Germany 9.91 China 9.21 Iran 8.23 S.Africa 8.10 Italy 6.02 UK 5.64 Turkey 5.16 France 5.13 Mexico 3.80 Brazil 2.35 Indonesia 1.89 India 1.79 China now has made the statement of carbon neutral, these countries especially have higher carbon emissions per capita should catch up.
2060 is way too late, but at the same time, I have a larger faith in China will actually reach the total than in the dysfunctional western “democracies”. Here in Sweden, the new fascist-backed right wing government has slashed spending on climate and environmental mitigation and even on preparedness for the changing climate. Even domestic emissions are now projected to go up in Sweden. While at the same time we also but all of our stuff from China and Bangladesh.
The US has 1/4 of China’s population and yet emits an amount equal to half of China’s carbon emissions. Wouldn’t it make more sense if instead of 15% of the world’s carbon emissions we emitted 7.5% since our population is 1/4 of China’s? China is a massive industrial country, but for us, all 330 million of our citizens need cars to do the most basic things. If anything, we are the ones that need to fix the emissions because China is already doing that.
Truth is, the emissions there still rise rapidly every single year. Polluters are polluting more and consumers are consuming more. Global governments focusing on carbon dioxide is still too little when it means the production of other greenhouse gases rise. This is a step in the right direction but it is at the same time only the first step of an endless marathon.
It’s not about achieving this goal it’s more about the way towards this goal. Setting unrealistic goals and short time frames to achieve those goals China will come much closer than any nation just talking about reducing carbon emissions. Also this change will see a global rise in investments in green energy. Unrealistic or not this is the only way for us to save this planet since China accounts for roughly 20% of the world’s population
It is ludicrous to measure carbon emission by countries because they vary in size dramatically. For example a country of 1 million people will never emit as much as a country of a billion even if it tries. The only reasonable way to measure the emission is by population average, which the US is twice as much as China. This means that the US needs to acknowledge the problem and get on board with the solution ASAP.
Regarding energy sources, at the moment: Wind, Solar, Geothermal and Hydro are the only “real renewables”. Nuclear is a huge question… Biomass energy is polluting, but sometimes labelled as renewable… Tidal waves and tribo-electric movements are still in the pre-development phase… Graphene circuits looks awesome but still way too early to tell… Looking forward to what other sources of renewable energy people will develop in the coming years.
Dumb to criticize it as being the biggest polluter when it has a population higher than the USA and Europe combined and still produces all the stuff for the people in the west too. Double standards of Western countries which had their industrial revolutions hundreds of years ago and now telling others not to do the same.
Our Democracies are not built to tackle millennium issues like technological labor displacement and climate change, they’re designed to have policymakers stall discussions on time-sensitive issues for several decades — ultimately leading to incremental change. If the conviction ($$$) of the US and EU are not firmly behind renewable transitions, then it will honestly be China and its top-down approach that will lead this century of sustainable development and beyond.
It is good that China and India are leading the responsibility of a greener future. While China has decided to be carbon neutral in 2020,India has achieved the target of renewable energy(by 40%) in 2020 which was set in 2030(now the target is increased to 60%).although the steps are small and nascent but they will surely lead us to a brighter and better future
Too much finger pointing, yes the west is responsible for heavy pollution in the past that likely exceeds chinas.. the west is also responsible for the technology and innovations that allow China to both advance as quickly as it has and even know what a solar panel is. A more productive conversation is how we all get to carbon neutrality
Basically the struggle is the same for everyone, if you rely on renawables you need a stable energy source behind to compensate renawables intermitency. Right now this can only be done by nuclear or carbon/fossil fuels. And electricity only accounts for 20% of all energy use. If we want to electrify it all, big problems also arise… Raw materials availability, electrical capacity, and we still do not have any trucks, planes or cargo ships who can run on electricity in an effective form.
Chinese big cities don’t use tramways like Germany, Sweden, France, Czech Republic and Japan. Electric cars are still cars, and it’s a long way to automated cars. Trams are a good reason not to get a car, they’re electric and don’t need Lithium batteries (let us remember Lithium is a limited natural resource)
on EVs, Norway’s the leader per capita, but China’s the leader by total numbers. also, another often skipped over topic is China’s reversal of desertification by massive multi-decade reforestation projects. they’ve successfully grown certain types saline-tolerant of rice along the borders of the Taklamakan desert, and sand tolerant bushes in the Gobi like the sea buckthorns(it’s delicious when juiced).
The ignorance and gullibility in this article is astounding. Chinese manufacturing is successful because its lack of environmental regulation facilitates cheaper Production of goods. China is not going to give up market share. China will continue to pollute. A politician making a promise about 40 years into the future (and 20 years after they leave the position) is just a waste of breath.
I would like to bring up a personal point here…….I love the Chinese people. They have a long and great history as well as a very rich culture. Communism (CCP), I cannot accept under any circumstance. So convinced that I WILL fight to the death to defend the US Constitution against ALL enemies, foreign or domestic. Saying that, i subscribe to what General George S. Patton said to the effect that I make the other sonofabitch die for his. Period…..no need to reply.
CO2 is not a greenhouse gas lololol! Water vapor can hold over twice the heat and there is over 100 times the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere on average. That is why it is cold at night in a dry desert and hot at night in a humid jungle. H2O vapor specific heat =1.864 kJ/kg, concentration in atmosphere = 4% CO2 specific heat = 0.846 kJ/kg, concentration in atmosphere = 0.04% H2O(1.864 kJ/kg x 4%) / (0.864 kJ/kg x 0.04) = 220.33 times the heat carrying capacity. Hard science > pathetic fear mongering 😛
China is the world biggest polluter no doubts but this way of assessing is totally biased.In fact you need to take into consideration of the Chinese population and their role of global factory. Indeed if you look at the contributions to pollution china is doing much better than US and other countries. Furthermore if you look green house emotion per capita it is far lower than other industrialized countries like US
The only reliable and long term solution for our never ending higher demand and use of energy is FUSION….it produces massive amount of energy and is friendly to environment. Bdw it’s just laughable that ppl think that electric cars are good for environment…look at all those battery plants tesla is building and how big of a problem batteries are for recycling + all those batteries gotta be filled ocne in a while, so you can actually drive an electric car from point A to B right (just like a regular car duhhh)…and how are all those batteries filled you might ask…mostly with electricity comming from nuclear/coal plants….so please gimme a break with those “environment friendly electric cars” propaganda.
If anyone can go green fast it’s China, you can use their 🚅 bullet train 🚆 infrastructure for example. Since the government “owns” everything there isn’t a lot of red tape. The reason other countries take so long to implement things like this is because of so much bureaucracy I’m not saying I’m a proponent of Communism but it gets the job done.
Honestly, if any country can achieve this ahead of time and under budget, it would be China. When it comes to large infrastructure projects no one beats china, the US has been struggling to build a single high-speed rail track from LA to SF. Also the while the rest of the world has been pushing to shut down nuclear–the only proven clean energy system–China has been innovating in the nuclear field.
I mean Beijing can set any targets they want for themselves. The real deal is whether China allows independent examination of their progress toward these goals. With a government this thick and opaque in China, breaking a promise is hard to catch. So relying on the authoritarian regime to hold itself accountable to its promises is not enough to stop climate change and curb China’s contribution to greenhouse gases. The true solution to climate change must include political and social changes, in addition to the obvious economic solutions.